<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (8) TMI 1519 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314468</link>
    <description>The Telangana HC dismissed an appeal challenging cancellation of supplementary sethwar proceedings. Revenue authorities sought to cancel land assignments made in 1961, claiming they were invalid as the relevant government order for ex-servicemen assignments came in 1963. The court held that under Section 166-B of the Land Revenue Act, while revision powers exist without limitation period, no fraud was alleged against petitioners. Without definitive conclusion of fraud and without first cancelling original assignments, permission for supplementary sethwar cancellation after fifteen years of issuance and five decades of assignment was improper. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2024 21:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (8) TMI 1519 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314468</link>
      <description>The Telangana HC dismissed an appeal challenging cancellation of supplementary sethwar proceedings. Revenue authorities sought to cancel land assignments made in 1961, claiming they were invalid as the relevant government order for ex-servicemen assignments came in 1963. The court held that under Section 166-B of the Land Revenue Act, while revision powers exist without limitation period, no fraud was alleged against petitioners. Without definitive conclusion of fraud and without first cancelling original assignments, permission for supplementary sethwar cancellation after fifteen years of issuance and five decades of assignment was improper. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>