https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314462 The MP HC quashed the Labour Court's rejection of petitioner's reinstatement application. The court found that respondents failed to file reply or cross-examine petitioner's claim of continuous service from 1995-1999, leaving his statement unrebutted. The Labour Court had granted reinstatement to similarly situated employees but denied it to petitioner despite finding he worked continuously, received no termination notice, and no retrenchment allowance. The HC directed reinstatement within two months, requiring petitioner to return any compensation received within one month. Back wages were denied as petitioner failed to prove unemployment during the pending case period. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2024 19:34:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314462 The MP HC quashed the Labour Court's rejection of petitioner's reinstatement application. The court found that respondents failed to file reply or cross-examine petitioner's claim of continuous service from 1995-1999, leaving his statement unrebutted. The Labour Court had granted reinstatement to similarly situated employees but denied it to petitioner despite finding he worked continuously, received no termination notice, and no retrenchment allowance. The HC directed reinstatement within two months, requiring petitioner to return any compensation received within one month. Back wages were denied as petitioner failed to prove unemployment during the pending case period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314462