<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 472 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753865</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147. Petitioner contested satisfaction note for reopening, claiming incriminating material lacked direct correlation with escaped income for relevant assessment year. Court held that since petitioner responded to notice u/s 142(1) on merits and allowed AO to pass assessment order, dispute involved factual questions regarding veracity of seized materials rather than pure legal issues. AO considered petitioner&#039;s detailed reply and documentary evidence before making additions based on unaccounted cash transactions found in search. Court directed petitioner to pursue appeal before CIT(A) as alternative remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 19:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 472 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753865</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed petition challenging reopening of assessment u/s 147. Petitioner contested satisfaction note for reopening, claiming incriminating material lacked direct correlation with escaped income for relevant assessment year. Court held that since petitioner responded to notice u/s 142(1) on merits and allowed AO to pass assessment order, dispute involved factual questions regarding veracity of seized materials rather than pure legal issues. AO considered petitioner&#039;s detailed reply and documentary evidence before making additions based on unaccounted cash transactions found in search. Court directed petitioner to pursue appeal before CIT(A) as alternative remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>