https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753861 An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act ordinarily bars writ intervention under Article 226, and the recognised exceptions apply only in limited cases such as a clear breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or a vires challenge. The Court found that the petitioner's complaints of illegality, unsigned orders, and procedural defect did not justify bypassing the appellate forum on the facts presented. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable in discretionary writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 11:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753861 An efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. GST Act ordinarily bars writ intervention under Article 226, and the recognised exceptions apply only in limited cases such as a clear breach of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or a vires challenge. The Court found that the petitioner's complaints of illegality, unsigned orders, and procedural defect did not justify bypassing the appellate forum on the facts presented. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable in discretionary writ jurisdiction, and the petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal remedy. Case-Laws GST Fri, 07 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753861