<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37064</link>
    <description>The court concluded that Explanation 2 to Section 153(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, finding that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had incorrectly applied the Explanation, resulting in the reassessment exceeding the prescribed period under Section 153(1). The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:00:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37064</link>
      <description>The court concluded that Explanation 2 to Section 153(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the reassessment proceedings. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, finding that the Appellate Assistant Commissioner had incorrectly applied the Explanation, resulting in the reassessment exceeding the prescribed period under Section 153(1). The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>