<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 459 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753852</link>
    <description>For life insurance business, income is computed under section 44 read with Rule 2 of the First Schedule on the actuarial surplus or deficit basis, and the assessee&#039;s method, including transfer between shareholders&#039; and policyholders&#039; accounts, was accepted as consistent with that special scheme. Exemptions under section 10(34) and section 10(23AAB) were treated as available in the insurance income computation, and section 14A was held not to override the special statutory regime. The applicable tax rate for life insurance business was also recognised under section 115B, so the higher rate applied by the Assessing Officer was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 459 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753852</link>
      <description>For life insurance business, income is computed under section 44 read with Rule 2 of the First Schedule on the actuarial surplus or deficit basis, and the assessee&#039;s method, including transfer between shareholders&#039; and policyholders&#039; accounts, was accepted as consistent with that special scheme. Exemptions under section 10(34) and section 10(23AAB) were treated as available in the insurance income computation, and section 14A was held not to override the special statutory regime. The applicable tax rate for life insurance business was also recognised under section 115B, so the higher rate applied by the Assessing Officer was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>