<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 456 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753849</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding contribution to Core Settlement Guarantee Fund (Core SGF), holding that statutory contributions made by a stock exchange to Core SGF under SEBI regulations are allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal followed coordinate bench precedent in BSE Ltd. case and noted that section 10(23EE) treats such contributions as income in recipient&#039;s hands, supporting corresponding deduction claim. Issues regarding leasehold land amortization, correct head of income for maintenance charges, and section 14A disallowance were remanded to lower authorities for fresh consideration with proper examination of facts and legal contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=756084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 456 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753849</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding contribution to Core Settlement Guarantee Fund (Core SGF), holding that statutory contributions made by a stock exchange to Core SGF under SEBI regulations are allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal followed coordinate bench precedent in BSE Ltd. case and noted that section 10(23EE) treats such contributions as income in recipient&#039;s hands, supporting corresponding deduction claim. Issues regarding leasehold land amortization, correct head of income for maintenance charges, and section 14A disallowance were remanded to lower authorities for fresh consideration with proper examination of facts and legal contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>