https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753846 CESTAT Bangalore classified imported ICON 82 Outdoor LCD with accessories under CTH 9013 8010 rather than 85287390. The tribunal followed SC precedent in CCE Aurangabad vs. Videocon Industries Ltd., which upheld CESTAT's classification of LCD sets under Chapter 90, Entry 9013.8010 as sound and unexceptionable. CESTAT also relied on its own decision in Xiaomi Technology India Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs classifying LCD panels under Chapter Heading 9013. The tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 17:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753846 CESTAT Bangalore classified imported ICON 82 Outdoor LCD with accessories under CTH 9013 8010 rather than 85287390. The tribunal followed SC precedent in CCE Aurangabad vs. Videocon Industries Ltd., which upheld CESTAT's classification of LCD sets under Chapter 90, Entry 9013.8010 as sound and unexceptionable. CESTAT also relied on its own decision in Xiaomi Technology India Limited vs. Commissioner of Customs classifying LCD panels under Chapter Heading 9013. The tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 08 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753846