https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753831 CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying exemption benefits under N/N. 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006. The appellant supplied goods to power projects under international competitive bidding and cleared goods without duty payment. Revenue denied exemption claiming goods under Central Excise Tariff Sub-headings 8413 and 8431 didn't qualify for exemption meant for Customs Sub-heading 9801. However, CESTAT relied on earlier precedent in appellant's own case, holding appellant entitled to notification benefits, finding no merit in the impugned order. en-us Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753831 CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside the order denying exemption benefits under N/N. 6/2006-CE dated 1.3.2006. The appellant supplied goods to power projects under international competitive bidding and cleared goods without duty payment. Revenue denied exemption claiming goods under Central Excise Tariff Sub-headings 8413 and 8431 didn't qualify for exemption meant for Customs Sub-heading 9801. However, CESTAT relied on earlier precedent in appellant's own case, holding appellant entitled to notification benefits, finding no merit in the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 07 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753831