<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753811</link>
    <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam upheld CIT(A)&#039;s direction to estimate gross profit at 6% of turnover from bank deposits. The assessee failed to provide documentary evidence proving that all credits were not turnover, despite claiming a variation of Rs. 63,27,044. Without books of account, bills, or vouchers to substantiate cash deposits, the tribunal found no infirmity in reducing the AO&#039;s original 8% estimation to 6%. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 418 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753811</link>
      <description>ITAT Visakhapatnam upheld CIT(A)&#039;s direction to estimate gross profit at 6% of turnover from bank deposits. The assessee failed to provide documentary evidence proving that all credits were not turnover, despite claiming a variation of Rs. 63,27,044. Without books of account, bills, or vouchers to substantiate cash deposits, the tribunal found no infirmity in reducing the AO&#039;s original 8% estimation to 6%. The assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>