<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 51 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37051</link>
    <description>Prior agricultural income-tax assessments do not operate as res judicata, but they may be treated as cogent evidence in later years on the same factual issue. Applying that principle, the Tribunal relied on earlier findings that the purchase money for the coconut garden had been transferred by the assessee to his wife, and treated the income from that property as part of the assessee&#039;s assessable agricultural income. The Court upheld that evidentiary approach and answered the question in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 11:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 51 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37051</link>
      <description>Prior agricultural income-tax assessments do not operate as res judicata, but they may be treated as cogent evidence in later years on the same factual issue. Applying that principle, the Tribunal relied on earlier findings that the purchase money for the coconut garden had been transferred by the assessee to his wife, and treated the income from that property as part of the assessee&#039;s assessable agricultural income. The Court upheld that evidentiary approach and answered the question in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>