<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 399 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the confiscation and penalty imposed on the appellant were void ab initio due to insufficient evidence of smuggling. However, the confiscation of cigarettes of foreign origin was upheld. The penalty imposed was reduced, and the judgment, pronounced on 15/05/2024, disposed of the appeal on revised terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 399 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the confiscation and penalty imposed on the appellant were void ab initio due to insufficient evidence of smuggling. However, the confiscation of cigarettes of foreign origin was upheld. The penalty imposed was reduced, and the judgment, pronounced on 15/05/2024, disposed of the appeal on revised terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>