https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314443 Interference with an acquittal is unwarranted where the trial court's view is a plausible one based on proper appreciation of evidence and no relevant material was ignored or misread; on that basis, leave to appeal was not justified. The prosecution case also failed because the two eyewitnesses accompanying the deceased could not identify the accused, the alleged eyewitness was treated as unreliable due to delayed disclosure and the manner of his affidavit evidence, and the medical and ballistic material did not complete a chain pointing only to the accused. Accordingly, the evidence did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the acquittal remained undisturbed. en-us Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:44:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314443 Interference with an acquittal is unwarranted where the trial court's view is a plausible one based on proper appreciation of evidence and no relevant material was ignored or misread; on that basis, leave to appeal was not justified. The prosecution case also failed because the two eyewitnesses accompanying the deceased could not identify the accused, the alleged eyewitness was treated as unreliable due to delayed disclosure and the manner of his affidavit evidence, and the medical and ballistic material did not complete a chain pointing only to the accused. Accordingly, the evidence did not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the acquittal remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314443