<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 372 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753765</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on pig iron could not be denied merely because vehicle particulars and transport documents were absent, where the inputs were duty paid, the goods were essential for manufacture of non-alloy ingots, and no corroborative evidence showed diversion or non-receipt in the factory. The Tribunal held that the allegation of bogus receipt was not proved on the record, and the credit was therefore allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 372 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753765</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on pig iron could not be denied merely because vehicle particulars and transport documents were absent, where the inputs were duty paid, the goods were essential for manufacture of non-alloy ingots, and no corroborative evidence showed diversion or non-receipt in the factory. The Tribunal held that the allegation of bogus receipt was not proved on the record, and the credit was therefore allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>