<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753764</link>
    <description>An adjudicating authority acting on remand must stay within the remand directions and cannot reopen issues already set aside, including duty on hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch and total pitch. The settled principle applied is that an adjudication cannot travel beyond the scope of the show cause notice, and a defect in the notice cannot be cured at the adjudication or appellate stage. On that basis, the remand proceedings were confined to PCM and the assessee&#039;s claim to Notification No. 28/89-C.E.; the quantification of duty on PCM with interest under the Central Excise Act was treated as consistent with the remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 371 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753764</link>
      <description>An adjudicating authority acting on remand must stay within the remand directions and cannot reopen issues already set aside, including duty on hard pitch, extra hard pitch, soft pitch and total pitch. The settled principle applied is that an adjudication cannot travel beyond the scope of the show cause notice, and a defect in the notice cannot be cured at the adjudication or appellate stage. On that basis, the remand proceedings were confined to PCM and the assessee&#039;s claim to Notification No. 28/89-C.E.; the quantification of duty on PCM with interest under the Central Excise Act was treated as consistent with the remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>