<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753756</link>
    <description>HC rejected the writ petition challenging tax recovery due to missed appeal timeline. Despite acknowledging potential electronic credit ledger discrepancies, the court granted petitioner 30 days to file a statutory appeal under GST laws. No costs were awarded, and the petition was disposed of with procedural liberty to pursue appeal within specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 363 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753756</link>
      <description>HC rejected the writ petition challenging tax recovery due to missed appeal timeline. Despite acknowledging potential electronic credit ledger discrepancies, the court granted petitioner 30 days to file a statutory appeal under GST laws. No costs were awarded, and the petition was disposed of with procedural liberty to pursue appeal within specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>