<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on TP adjustment for guarantee commission &amp; ESOP expense. No disallowance u/s 14A as no exempt income earned.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78330</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict TP adjustment on guarantee commission to 0.2% for one financial year, finding TPO&#039;s 0.77% adjustment unjustified. The ITAT also supported CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of 0.25% mark-up without basis. Regarding ESOP expenses, ITAT agreed with CIT(A) that discount on ESOP shares was deductible u/s 37(1) as it was not a capital expenditure. Disallowance u/s 14A was rejected as no exempt income was earned, following precedents that disallowance cannot exceed exempt income. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on TP adjustment for guarantee commission &amp; ESOP expense. No disallowance u/s 14A as no exempt income earned.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78330</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to restrict TP adjustment on guarantee commission to 0.2% for one financial year, finding TPO&#039;s 0.77% adjustment unjustified. The ITAT also supported CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of 0.25% mark-up without basis. Regarding ESOP expenses, ITAT agreed with CIT(A) that discount on ESOP shares was deductible u/s 37(1) as it was not a capital expenditure. Disallowance u/s 14A was rejected as no exempt income was earned, following precedents that disallowance cannot exceed exempt income. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:43:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>