<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1687 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the appellants&#039; claim for interest on the refunded amount deposited during the investigation. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the interest issue. The appellants can now present their case and reference relevant decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 14:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1687 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the Original Adjudicating Authority to reconsider the appellants&#039; claim for interest on the refunded amount deposited during the investigation. The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the Adjudicating Authority had not addressed the interest issue. The appellants can now present their case and reference relevant decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>