<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (2) TMI 1389 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314430</link>
    <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal of a 65-year-old senior citizen assessee for statistical purposes. The tribunal condoned the ex-parte order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 due to the assessee&#039;s age, education background, and improper service of notices under the faceless regime. The tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s attempt to dismiss the appeal under section 249(4)(b) for non-payment of advance tax, finding the assessee&#039;s total income was only Rs.13,296 with no admitted tax liability. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh examination regarding the assessee&#039;s claim that the property sold was agricultural land not liable for capital gains tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 14:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755818" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (2) TMI 1389 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314430</link>
      <description>ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal of a 65-year-old senior citizen assessee for statistical purposes. The tribunal condoned the ex-parte order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 due to the assessee&#039;s age, education background, and improper service of notices under the faceless regime. The tribunal rejected the revenue&#039;s attempt to dismiss the appeal under section 249(4)(b) for non-payment of advance tax, finding the assessee&#039;s total income was only Rs.13,296 with no admitted tax liability. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh examination regarding the assessee&#039;s claim that the property sold was agricultural land not liable for capital gains tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>