https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753736 A writ challenge to reversal of Input Tax Credit was not entertained because the impugned order had considered the taxpayer's reply and supporting documents, including the supplier certificate, and gave reasons for rejecting that certificate. The Court found no violation of natural justice and held that writ jurisdiction was not appropriate where an effective statutory remedy remained available and the taxpayer was still within the prescribed time to pursue it. The petitioner was left to avail the statutory remedy. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 May 2025 10:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753736 A writ challenge to reversal of Input Tax Credit was not entertained because the impugned order had considered the taxpayer's reply and supporting documents, including the supplier certificate, and gave reasons for rejecting that certificate. The Court found no violation of natural justice and held that writ jurisdiction was not appropriate where an effective statutory remedy remained available and the taxpayer was still within the prescribed time to pursue it. The petitioner was left to avail the statutory remedy. Case-Laws GST Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753736