<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753734</link>
    <description>HC found tax order invalid due to failure to consider petitioner&#039;s reply to show cause notice. Order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, directing respondent to provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within three months. Discrepancies in tax returns were not conclusively determined, with petitioner given opportunity to explain credit note and invoice variations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 341 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753734</link>
      <description>HC found tax order invalid due to failure to consider petitioner&#039;s reply to show cause notice. Order was set aside and remanded for reconsideration, directing respondent to provide personal hearing and issue fresh order within three months. Discrepancies in tax returns were not conclusively determined, with petitioner given opportunity to explain credit note and invoice variations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>