<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision u/s 263: ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on eligibility for deduction u/s 80G. No error found in AO&#039;s decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78296</link>
    <description>The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 by the CIT regarding the eligibility to claim deduction u/s 80G for donations made under CSR activities. The ITAT held that the Principal CIT should conduct necessary inquiries before deeming the AO&#039;s order as erroneous. It was emphasized that if queries were raised during assessment and responded to by the assessee, it does not imply a lack of application of mind by the AO. The ITAT found the assessee eligible for the deduction u/s 80G, with no dispute on the genuineness of contributions. As the AO had applied his mind and verified facts, the ITAT set aside the CIT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:27 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision u/s 263: ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on eligibility for deduction u/s 80G. No error found in AO&#039;s decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78296</link>
      <description>The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 by the CIT regarding the eligibility to claim deduction u/s 80G for donations made under CSR activities. The ITAT held that the Principal CIT should conduct necessary inquiries before deeming the AO&#039;s order as erroneous. It was emphasized that if queries were raised during assessment and responded to by the assessee, it does not imply a lack of application of mind by the AO. The ITAT found the assessee eligible for the deduction u/s 80G, with no dispute on the genuineness of contributions. As the AO had applied his mind and verified facts, the ITAT set aside the CIT&#039;s order, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:27 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>