<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s registration application u/s 12AB rejected for not proving activities&#039; genuineness. Tribunal grants another chance for proper hearing.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78299</link>
    <description>The ITAT considered the grant of registration u/s 12AB, where the assessee&#039;s application was rejected for non-compliance and failure to prove genuineness of activities. The company incorporated in 2021 filed for registration in 2022 with financial statements. The ITAT found the CIT(E)&#039;s decision incorrect as the final accounts were filed. Donation and expenditure details were provided, supported by receipts and bills. The AO accepted the expenditure in a previous assessment. The ITAT concluded the assessee is engaged in charitable activities and deserves another opportunity to be heard by the CIT(E) for a fair decision. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s registration application u/s 12AB rejected for not proving activities&#039; genuineness. Tribunal grants another chance for proper hearing.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78299</link>
      <description>The ITAT considered the grant of registration u/s 12AB, where the assessee&#039;s application was rejected for non-compliance and failure to prove genuineness of activities. The company incorporated in 2021 filed for registration in 2022 with financial statements. The ITAT found the CIT(E)&#039;s decision incorrect as the final accounts were filed. Donation and expenditure details were provided, supported by receipts and bills. The AO accepted the expenditure in a previous assessment. The ITAT concluded the assessee is engaged in charitable activities and deserves another opportunity to be heard by the CIT(E) for a fair decision. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:05:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>