<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 306 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753699</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad classified services related to merger and acquisitions, including financial analysis, due diligence, and deal structuring, as Business and Management Consultancy Services subject to service tax. The tribunal upheld the extended limitation period, finding the appellant&#039;s non-registration and non-payment constituted willful suppression rather than bonafide error, citing a 2001 Board clarification. Interest and penalties under Sections 75, 77, and 78 were deemed maintainable. The matter was partly remanded to the original authority for redetermination of tax quantum and Section 78 penalty, with instructions to exclude amounts classifiable under Legal Consultancy Services for the pre-September 2009 period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 306 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753699</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad classified services related to merger and acquisitions, including financial analysis, due diligence, and deal structuring, as Business and Management Consultancy Services subject to service tax. The tribunal upheld the extended limitation period, finding the appellant&#039;s non-registration and non-payment constituted willful suppression rather than bonafide error, citing a 2001 Board clarification. Interest and penalties under Sections 75, 77, and 78 were deemed maintainable. The matter was partly remanded to the original authority for redetermination of tax quantum and Section 78 penalty, with instructions to exclude amounts classifiable under Legal Consultancy Services for the pre-September 2009 period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>