<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1482 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the early hearing application filed by the Appellant, citing insufficient evidence of financial instability or risk to credit rating. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claims of significant financial impact due to blocked working capital and denied CENVAT Credit, the Tribunal determined that the criteria for expedited consideration were unmet, as no supporting documentary evidence was provided. Consequently, the appeal will proceed under standard scheduling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 20:46:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1482 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the early hearing application filed by the Appellant, citing insufficient evidence of financial instability or risk to credit rating. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claims of significant financial impact due to blocked working capital and denied CENVAT Credit, the Tribunal determined that the criteria for expedited consideration were unmet, as no supporting documentary evidence was provided. Consequently, the appeal will proceed under standard scheduling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>