<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 285 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753678</link>
    <description>HC dismisses writ petition challenging GST assessment order under section 74. Court found that the extended limitation period was appropriately invoked based on alleged wilful misstatement, and the show cause notice provided clear justification. Petitioners can pursue statutory remedies, but extraordinary writ jurisdiction does not permit challenging the assessment&#039;s technical merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 285 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753678</link>
      <description>HC dismisses writ petition challenging GST assessment order under section 74. Court found that the extended limitation period was appropriately invoked based on alleged wilful misstatement, and the show cause notice provided clear justification. Petitioners can pursue statutory remedies, but extraordinary writ jurisdiction does not permit challenging the assessment&#039;s technical merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>