<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 26 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37020</link>
    <description>The expression &quot;attributable to&quot; was treated as wider than &quot;derived from&quot;, so balancing charge under section 41(2) on sale of machinery used in a priority-industry business was included in the profits and gains attributable to that business. On that construction, the machinery-sale income was not excluded merely because it arose on sale of old machinery and qualified for deduction under section 80E(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:33:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 26 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37020</link>
      <description>The expression &quot;attributable to&quot; was treated as wider than &quot;derived from&quot;, so balancing charge under section 41(2) on sale of machinery used in a priority-industry business was included in the profits and gains attributable to that business. On that construction, the machinery-sale income was not excluded merely because it arose on sale of old machinery and qualified for deduction under section 80E(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>