https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753676 The Madras HC directed the respondent to reimburse GST amount paid by the petitioner for works contract services within eight weeks. The court relied on precedent from Subaya Constructions Company Ltd. case, applying paragraphs 10(a) and 12 of G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance Department dated 09.10.2017. The petition seeking GST reimbursement was allowed and disposed of, overturning the initial rejection of the petitioner's request. en-us Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753676 The Madras HC directed the respondent to reimburse GST amount paid by the petitioner for works contract services within eight weeks. The court relied on precedent from Subaya Constructions Company Ltd. case, applying paragraphs 10(a) and 12 of G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance Department dated 09.10.2017. The petition seeking GST reimbursement was allowed and disposed of, overturning the initial rejection of the petitioner's request. Case-Laws GST Mon, 22 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753676