<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 281 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753674</link>
    <description>HC quashed tax assessment order due to procedural irregularities. Petitioner challenged GST notice and garnishee order alleging lack of proper notice. Court directed tax authorities to provide personal hearing, grant two weeks for reply, and issue fresh order within two months. Bank attachment was lifted, and all legal contentions remained open for petitioner in subsequent proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 281 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753674</link>
      <description>HC quashed tax assessment order due to procedural irregularities. Petitioner challenged GST notice and garnishee order alleging lack of proper notice. Court directed tax authorities to provide personal hearing, grant two weeks for reply, and issue fresh order within two months. Bank attachment was lifted, and all legal contentions remained open for petitioner in subsequent proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>