<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 275 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753668</link>
    <description>ITAT Indore upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding provision claims and capital expenditure on LAN network/electrical expenses. The tribunal found AO&#039;s assessment order erroneous as it lacked proper inquiry into allowability of provision claims, showing no application of mind. While assessee argued AO had conducted inquiry and taken possible view, tribunal noted complete absence of examination on provision allowability. Regarding capital expenditure disallowance of Rs. 27,19,000, tribunal directed AO to verify from records whether assessee made suo moto disallowance, as this wasn&#039;t brought to PCIT&#039;s notice during s.263 proceedings. Assessee&#039;s appeals dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2024 08:14:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 275 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753668</link>
      <description>ITAT Indore upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263 regarding provision claims and capital expenditure on LAN network/electrical expenses. The tribunal found AO&#039;s assessment order erroneous as it lacked proper inquiry into allowability of provision claims, showing no application of mind. While assessee argued AO had conducted inquiry and taken possible view, tribunal noted complete absence of examination on provision allowability. Regarding capital expenditure disallowance of Rs. 27,19,000, tribunal directed AO to verify from records whether assessee made suo moto disallowance, as this wasn&#039;t brought to PCIT&#039;s notice during s.263 proceedings. Assessee&#039;s appeals dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>