<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (3) TMI 1455 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the voluntary disallowance of Rs. 33,62,493/- made by the assessee under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Tribunal held that no disallowance under Sec. 14A could be made without exempt income, permitting assessed income to fall below the returned income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (3) TMI 1455 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the voluntary disallowance of Rs. 33,62,493/- made by the assessee under Rule 8D(2)(iii). The Tribunal held that no disallowance under Sec. 14A could be made without exempt income, permitting assessed income to fall below the returned income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>