<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (9) TMI 1594 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314406</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that TPO&#039;s rejection of Cost Plus Method (CPM) in favor of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was unjustified when complete books were produced, directing acceptance of CPM as most appropriate method. Corporate guarantees to associated enterprises constitute international transactions under Section 92B, with arm&#039;s length price fixed at 0.5% per annum. Tribunal allowed deductions under Section 10B for export profits and Section 35(2AB) for R&amp;amp;D expenses, following previous orders in assessee&#039;s own case. Various disallowances including rental expenditure, FCCB premium, and Section 14A were deleted or remanded for re-computation based on coordinate bench precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (9) TMI 1594 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314406</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that TPO&#039;s rejection of Cost Plus Method (CPM) in favor of Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was unjustified when complete books were produced, directing acceptance of CPM as most appropriate method. Corporate guarantees to associated enterprises constitute international transactions under Section 92B, with arm&#039;s length price fixed at 0.5% per annum. Tribunal allowed deductions under Section 10B for export profits and Section 35(2AB) for R&amp;amp;D expenses, following previous orders in assessee&#039;s own case. Various disallowances including rental expenditure, FCCB premium, and Section 14A were deleted or remanded for re-computation based on coordinate bench precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>