https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314407 Prior approval under Regulation 101 was a condition precedent for appointment to a non-teaching post in an aided institution, so an appointment made without such approval was void and could not be validated by later approval. The same reasoning meant the appointee could not rely on post facto sanction to sustain the appointment. The document also states that, where the higher-ranked candidate's refusal to join was not proved and remained unchallenged, the second empanelled candidate had no enforceable right to appointment against the vacancy. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:09:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314407 Prior approval under Regulation 101 was a condition precedent for appointment to a non-teaching post in an aided institution, so an appointment made without such approval was void and could not be validated by later approval. The same reasoning meant the appointee could not rely on post facto sanction to sustain the appointment. The document also states that, where the higher-ranked candidate's refusal to join was not proved and remained unchallenged, the second empanelled candidate had no enforceable right to appointment against the vacancy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314407