https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314409 The SC allowed appeals and quashed the Allahabad HC judgment that had declared the state government's policy decision regarding additional compensation to farmers for land acquisition by YEIDA as arbitrary and unfair. The SC held that the policy decision, made after recommendations by the Chaudhary Committee following extensive stakeholder consultations, was in larger public interest and addressed farmers' concerns about discriminatory compensation compared to NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. The Court emphasized that public interest outweighs personal interest, and the policy was rational, relevant, and based on ground realities to resolve stalled development projects. en-us Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 20:09:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314409 The SC allowed appeals and quashed the Allahabad HC judgment that had declared the state government's policy decision regarding additional compensation to farmers for land acquisition by YEIDA as arbitrary and unfair. The SC held that the policy decision, made after recommendations by the Chaudhary Committee following extensive stakeholder consultations, was in larger public interest and addressed farmers' concerns about discriminatory compensation compared to NOIDA and Greater NOIDA. The Court emphasized that public interest outweighs personal interest, and the policy was rational, relevant, and based on ground realities to resolve stalled development projects. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314409