<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (11) TMI 81 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37007</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras interpreted relief under section 84 of the Income Tax Act for an assessee company. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the relief of 6% on capital employed should not be limited proportionately to the period of machinery usage but granted for each of the five years as intended by the statute. The court emphasized liberal construction of exemption provisions to uphold benefits granted by Parliament, ultimately allowing the assessee to receive the full relief without time limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:32:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (11) TMI 81 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37007</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras interpreted relief under section 84 of the Income Tax Act for an assessee company. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the relief of 6% on capital employed should not be limited proportionately to the period of machinery usage but granted for each of the five years as intended by the statute. The court emphasized liberal construction of exemption provisions to uphold benefits granted by Parliament, ultimately allowing the assessee to receive the full relief without time limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>