https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314397 A party that itself sought transfer of a suit to the Wakf Tribunal and participated in the proceedings was held unable to later challenge the Tribunal's jurisdiction, as it had accepted that forum and could not approbate and reprobate. A High Court petition was also not incompetent merely because it was styled under Article 226, since nomenclature does not control jurisdiction where supervisory review of the Tribunal's decision is otherwise available. On the tenancy issue, the Court stated that rent receipts, ration cards, or payment of rent do not by themselves prove joint Hindu family property; absent proof of joint family funds or blending, the tenancy may be treated as an individual right, and the surrender by the Karta was upheld. en-us Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:23:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314397 A party that itself sought transfer of a suit to the Wakf Tribunal and participated in the proceedings was held unable to later challenge the Tribunal's jurisdiction, as it had accepted that forum and could not approbate and reprobate. A High Court petition was also not incompetent merely because it was styled under Article 226, since nomenclature does not control jurisdiction where supervisory review of the Tribunal's decision is otherwise available. On the tenancy issue, the Court stated that rent receipts, ration cards, or payment of rent do not by themselves prove joint Hindu family property; absent proof of joint family funds or blending, the tenancy may be treated as an individual right, and the surrender by the Karta was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314397