<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (1) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37005</link>
    <description>The disallowance of Rs. 9,000 out of the managing director&#039;s remuneration was deemed unjustified by the High Court, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. However, the interpretation of section 84(2)(iv) regarding income-tax relief was found incorrect, requiring the Tribunal to reassess compliance based on the High Court&#039;s directives. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (1) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37005</link>
      <description>The disallowance of Rs. 9,000 out of the managing director&#039;s remuneration was deemed unjustified by the High Court, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. However, the interpretation of section 84(2)(iv) regarding income-tax relief was found incorrect, requiring the Tribunal to reassess compliance based on the High Court&#039;s directives. The parties were instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=37005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>