<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 214 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753607</link>
    <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding s.14A disallowance, the tribunal held no interest expenditure disallowance was warranted as the assessee company had sufficient interest-free funds (share capital/reserves) exceeding investments in exempt income-yielding shares, following SC precedent in South Indian Bank Ltd. For cash expenses, partial disallowance of vehicle running expenses was upheld due to possible personal usage, but other expense disallowances were deleted for lack of justification. Under s.68, no addition for unexplained loan was sustainable as assessee proved lender&#039;s identity and loan confirmation, following Lovely Exports precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755489" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 214 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753607</link>
      <description>ITAT Raipur dismissed revenue&#039;s appeal on multiple grounds. Regarding s.14A disallowance, the tribunal held no interest expenditure disallowance was warranted as the assessee company had sufficient interest-free funds (share capital/reserves) exceeding investments in exempt income-yielding shares, following SC precedent in South Indian Bank Ltd. For cash expenses, partial disallowance of vehicle running expenses was upheld due to possible personal usage, but other expense disallowances were deleted for lack of justification. Under s.68, no addition for unexplained loan was sustainable as assessee proved lender&#039;s identity and loan confirmation, following Lovely Exports precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>