<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules on Misdeclared Origin of Aluminum Plates; Revises Penalties Under Customs Act Sections 114A, 114AA, 112A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78194</link>
    <description>The case involved the classification of imported goods as Pre-Sensitized Positive Offset Aluminum Plates for levy of anti-dumping duty. The country of origin was mis-declared as Taiwan instead of China. The tribunal held that both Pre-Sensitized and Digital offset plates fall under the same classification. The revenue failed to prove the goods were digital offset plates, entitling the appellant to benefit from a specific customs notification. Penalties u/s 114A, 114AA, and 112A of the Customs Act were upheld, but revised due to the appellant&#039;s disclosure during investigation. The appeal was allowed for remand to the original adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules on Misdeclared Origin of Aluminum Plates; Revises Penalties Under Customs Act Sections 114A, 114AA, 112A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78194</link>
      <description>The case involved the classification of imported goods as Pre-Sensitized Positive Offset Aluminum Plates for levy of anti-dumping duty. The country of origin was mis-declared as Taiwan instead of China. The tribunal held that both Pre-Sensitized and Digital offset plates fall under the same classification. The revenue failed to prove the goods were digital offset plates, entitling the appellant to benefit from a specific customs notification. Penalties u/s 114A, 114AA, and 112A of the Customs Act were upheld, but revised due to the appellant&#039;s disclosure during investigation. The appeal was allowed for remand to the original adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>