<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Validity of Order u/s 17 of FEMA challenged for lack of hearing opportunity. Writ petition allowed due to delay and violation of natural justice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78204</link>
    <description>The High Court examined the validity of an order issued u/s 17 of FEMA, where petitioners claimed lack of hearing opportunity. The court ruled that availability of statutory appeal doesn&#039;t bar writ petition u/s Article 226 if fundamental rights or natural justice principles are violated. Lack of opportunity to challenge information gathered unfairly breached natural justice. Delayed penalty imposition for non-realization of export proceeds was unfair, as petitioners were not given a chance to defend against alleged contraventions. The first petitioner, no longer operational, faced unjustified delay in notice issuance after over a decade, leading to quashing of the order and demand notice in favor of the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755452" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Validity of Order u/s 17 of FEMA challenged for lack of hearing opportunity. Writ petition allowed due to delay and violation of natural justice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78204</link>
      <description>The High Court examined the validity of an order issued u/s 17 of FEMA, where petitioners claimed lack of hearing opportunity. The court ruled that availability of statutory appeal doesn&#039;t bar writ petition u/s Article 226 if fundamental rights or natural justice principles are violated. Lack of opportunity to challenge information gathered unfairly breached natural justice. Delayed penalty imposition for non-realization of export proceeds was unfair, as petitioners were not given a chance to defend against alleged contraventions. The first petitioner, no longer operational, faced unjustified delay in notice issuance after over a decade, leading to quashing of the order and demand notice in favor of the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:22:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>