<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (12) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36997</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues except for the second question, deeming it unrelated to the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for late filing. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the WTO&#039;s order, as the Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed invalid. Additionally, the court supported the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to decide on the appeal&#039;s merits without remanding it to the AAC. The assessee was awarded costs of the references, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:30:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=75543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (12) TMI 17 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36997</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues except for the second question, deeming it unrelated to the Tribunal&#039;s order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty was upheld due to the assessee&#039;s reasonable cause for late filing. The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the WTO&#039;s order, as the Commissioner&#039;s order was deemed invalid. Additionally, the court supported the Tribunal&#039;s discretion to decide on the appeal&#039;s merits without remanding it to the AAC. The assessee was awarded costs of the references, including counsel&#039;s fee of Rs. 500.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>