https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753566 Where a statutory appeal is pending and the required pre-deposit has already been made, recovery of the balance disputed tax should ordinarily be stayed unless special reasons are recorded. The court held that refusal of stay without cogent reasons was unjustified and that the appellate framework permits stay on conditions under Section 33(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It therefore set aside the impugned order and protected recovery of the balance demand during the appeal, subject to an additional 25% deposit, bringing the total deposit to 50%. en-us Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Jun 2024 08:21:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753566 Where a statutory appeal is pending and the required pre-deposit has already been made, recovery of the balance disputed tax should ordinarily be stayed unless special reasons are recorded. The court held that refusal of stay without cogent reasons was unjustified and that the appellate framework permits stay on conditions under Section 33(b) of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005. It therefore set aside the impugned order and protected recovery of the balance demand during the appeal, subject to an additional 25% deposit, bringing the total deposit to 50%. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 10 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753566