<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 915 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314392</link>
    <description>Deputation allowance was held to depend on actual transfer of command, control and emoluments to the borrowing organisation. Personnel from CISF and other Central Para Military Forces were therefore not entitled to the allowance from the date of NDRF&#039;s constitution, but only from 11.09.2009 when the battalions came under NDRF command and pay began to be drawn from NDRF. The SC also held that relief in proceedings by a single employee could not be extended nationwide to all similarly placed personnel, as such directions exceeded the territorial and pleading limits of the case. The wider High Court directions were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 20:08:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 915 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314392</link>
      <description>Deputation allowance was held to depend on actual transfer of command, control and emoluments to the borrowing organisation. Personnel from CISF and other Central Para Military Forces were therefore not entitled to the allowance from the date of NDRF&#039;s constitution, but only from 11.09.2009 when the battalions came under NDRF command and pay began to be drawn from NDRF. The SC also held that relief in proceedings by a single employee could not be extended nationwide to all similarly placed personnel, as such directions exceeded the territorial and pleading limits of the case. The wider High Court directions were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>