https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314383 In preventive detention based on subjective satisfaction, reliance on even one non-existent, irrelevant, or misconceived ground vitiates the entire order. Here, the detaining authority treated the omission of purchasers' names and addresses on cash memos for high speed diesel oil as a licence breach, but that requirement had already been dispensed with by a government order in force at the material time. The ground was therefore wholly unfounded and showed non-application of mind. Because it was impossible to know how far this bad ground influenced the detention decision, the order was invalid and was quashed. en-us Tue, 12 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Jun 2024 17:41:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314383 In preventive detention based on subjective satisfaction, reliance on even one non-existent, irrelevant, or misconceived ground vitiates the entire order. Here, the detaining authority treated the omission of purchasers' names and addresses on cash memos for high speed diesel oil as a licence breach, but that requirement had already been dispensed with by a government order in force at the material time. The ground was therefore wholly unfounded and showed non-application of mind. Because it was impossible to know how far this bad ground influenced the detention decision, the order was invalid and was quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Nov 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314383