<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 158 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753551</link>
    <description>Allegations of fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under the CGST Act, involving alleged fake firms and no actual supply of goods, were assessed against the seriousness of the offence, the prescribed punishment, the material on record, the absence of any shown device by which the firms were created, and the period already spent in custody. On that basis, and without expressing any view on the merits, the applicants were found entitled to bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 21:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 158 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753551</link>
      <description>Allegations of fraudulent availment and passing on of input tax credit under the CGST Act, involving alleged fake firms and no actual supply of goods, were assessed against the seriousness of the offence, the prescribed punishment, the material on record, the absence of any shown device by which the firms were created, and the period already spent in custody. On that basis, and without expressing any view on the merits, the applicants were found entitled to bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>