<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 140 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753533</link>
    <description>A customs broker&#039;s duties under Regulations 10(d) and 10(n) are limited to advising compliance, reporting known non-compliance, and verifying IEC, GSTIN, client identity and declared business existence through reliable, independent and authentic material. Reliance on genuine government-issued documents is sufficient; the broker is not required to physically inspect every client premises or independently second-guess registrations issued by competent authorities. Because the later discovery that the exporter was non-existent did not, on these facts, prove the broker&#039;s own failure, the alleged breaches were not established and the revocation of licence, forfeiture of security deposit and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 140 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753533</link>
      <description>A customs broker&#039;s duties under Regulations 10(d) and 10(n) are limited to advising compliance, reporting known non-compliance, and verifying IEC, GSTIN, client identity and declared business existence through reliable, independent and authentic material. Reliance on genuine government-issued documents is sufficient; the broker is not required to physically inspect every client premises or independently second-guess registrations issued by competent authorities. Because the later discovery that the exporter was non-existent did not, on these facts, prove the broker&#039;s own failure, the alleged breaches were not established and the revocation of licence, forfeiture of security deposit and penalty were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=753533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>