<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Violation of natural justice - No speaking order u/s 17(5) of Customs Act, 1962 - Declared value rejection without reasons - Appeal dismissed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78138</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that violation of principles of natural justice occurred due to non-passing of a speaking order u/s 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The rejection of the declared value without reasons or evidence was deemed improper. The Proper Officer failed to pass a speaking order for enhancement of declared value within the specified timeframe, rendering the enhanced value unsustainable. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasons for rejecting the transaction value u/s 17(5). Consequently, the declared value by the respondent was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:48 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Violation of natural justice - No speaking order u/s 17(5) of Customs Act, 1962 - Declared value rejection without reasons - Appeal dismissed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78138</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata held that violation of principles of natural justice occurred due to non-passing of a speaking order u/s 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. The rejection of the declared value without reasons or evidence was deemed improper. The Proper Officer failed to pass a speaking order for enhancement of declared value within the specified timeframe, rendering the enhanced value unsustainable. The adjudicating authority did not provide reasons for rejecting the transaction value u/s 17(5). Consequently, the declared value by the respondent was upheld, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:48 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>