<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Plea for RP replacement denied as no authorization for lawyer to meet PG. New RP appointed. Debtor to prepare repayment plan.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the issue of replacing the Resolution Professional (RP) due to alleged lack of desire to streamline the process. The RP&#039;s role in preparing the repayment plan was discussed u/s 105 of IBC, 2016, emphasizing that the plan must be prepared by the Debtor, with RP&#039;s consultation. The RP&#039;s authority to conduct negotiations between debtor and creditors was highlighted u/s 100(2) of IBC. The decision appointed a new RP, Mr. Shiv Nandan Sharma, u/s 105(2) of the Code, emphasizing that the previous RP should not be held accountable. The application was disposed of, with the new RP instructed to fulfill duties as per the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Plea for RP replacement denied as no authorization for lawyer to meet PG. New RP appointed. Debtor to prepare repayment plan.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the issue of replacing the Resolution Professional (RP) due to alleged lack of desire to streamline the process. The RP&#039;s role in preparing the repayment plan was discussed u/s 105 of IBC, 2016, emphasizing that the plan must be prepared by the Debtor, with RP&#039;s consultation. The RP&#039;s authority to conduct negotiations between debtor and creditors was highlighted u/s 100(2) of IBC. The decision appointed a new RP, Mr. Shiv Nandan Sharma, u/s 105(2) of the Code, emphasizing that the previous RP should not be held accountable. The application was disposed of, with the new RP instructed to fulfill duties as per the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 08:14:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=78144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>