<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1729 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314373</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai adjudicated cross-appeals for AY 2010-11 concerning alleged bogus purchases. The assessee&#039;s income was initially increased by 12.5% due to non-genuine purchases. However, the first appellate authority reduced the addition to 6%, aligning with a prior decision for a related entity for AY 2011-12. The Tribunal upheld this 6% addition, finding consistency with the sister concern&#039;s case, and dismissed both appeals, finalizing the decision on 11th September 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 19:47:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=755279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1729 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314373</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai adjudicated cross-appeals for AY 2010-11 concerning alleged bogus purchases. The assessee&#039;s income was initially increased by 12.5% due to non-genuine purchases. However, the first appellate authority reduced the addition to 6%, aligning with a prior decision for a related entity for AY 2011-12. The Tribunal upheld this 6% addition, finding consistency with the sister concern&#039;s case, and dismissed both appeals, finalizing the decision on 11th September 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>