https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314369 Prompt administrative processing of a detenu's representation satisfied the constitutional requirement, because the file moved through the usual chain without indifference, lethargy, or negligence; the detention order was not vitiated on that ground. The challenge based on alleged extraneous considerations also failed, because the detention was supported by forest-offence activities, the Court treated ecological harm as falling within the Act's public-order concept, and Section 5A preserved the order even if one ground were irrelevant. The writ petition was rejected and the preventive detention remained valid. en-us Tue, 25 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Jun 2024 12:08:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314369 Prompt administrative processing of a detenu's representation satisfied the constitutional requirement, because the file moved through the usual chain without indifference, lethargy, or negligence; the detention order was not vitiated on that ground. The challenge based on alleged extraneous considerations also failed, because the detention was supported by forest-offence activities, the Court treated ecological harm as falling within the Act's public-order concept, and Section 5A preserved the order even if one ground were irrelevant. The writ petition was rejected and the preventive detention remained valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Aug 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=314369